Rare and Intimate photographs of the Japanese Yakuza
Supermodels and their yearbook photos
How to not care what other people think of you
Aerial photos of Iceland that look like abstract paintings
Nature, you are a thing of beauty
Reach over one million taste makers a month
50 Seriously Awesome Halloween Costume Ideas For Kids
36 Moments Showing You The True Meaning Of Love
And This Is Why You Should Be Following National Geographic On Instagram
Props To All The Awesome Dog Owners Out There
Cat Selfies Are The Best Thing Ever!
9 Common Mistakes That Parents With Good Intentions Make Because Of Ignorance
Life Has Its Share Of Beautiful Moments
A Few Things Only Cat Owners Will Understand
23 Pictures Of Hipsters Taking It To The Next Level
28 Pieces Of Technology That Show We Are Living In The Future Now
Kids And Animals = A Winning Combination Of Cute!
31 Cat Thieves Caught in the Act
18 Awesome Halloween Ideas For Physically Disabled Children
August 30, 2012 | 7 Comments » | Topics: Uncategorized
All well and good, being smart that is…but can they juggle and wiggle their ears? I thought not. My advice to them is focus on the important things….impressing the girls (or boys if that’s your thing)
A 779 on the SAT isn’t possible. The SAT is scored on ten-point intervals, so the only possible scores are 770, 780, etc. And it’s also not particularly impressive, certainly not “supergenius” level compared to the people on this list.
The SAT was not always scored in 10 point intervals. Does no one remember that Zack Morris scored a 1502? I agree that it’s not that impressive though.
I take it the two of you above me didn’t score a perfects 800 on verbal. Unlike James Woods.
I take it you did not score a perfect 800 on the verbal section either.
I only scored a 600s. The SATs do not share my fondness of the superfluous s.
Have they changed the way IQs are determined in the past few decades? It was always my understanding that the determination of IQs past about 170-180 grew fuzzy and the numbers were highly unreliable…