He is? And he hypocritically accused me of a lack of integrity! At the time I thought his accusation re. “integrity and pride” showed a misunderstanding of these words, but poor standards of english are common on this site.
I honestly can’t say I am an admin at this site. And you are correct, maybe integrity and pride were not the correct words to use. Although a cynical view on any positive message shows a lack of trust and social ineptitude towards your fellow human being. When the default answer to anything positive is to call bullshit, one must assume a lack of confidence in basic emotional “integrity” and an unstable capacity for trust. A lack of pride was really more of a baseless assumption than anything supported by concrete evidence. But as past experience has shown me; pessimists don’t generally thing very highly of themselves.
I think those who have such an incredible hate towards this site are the one’s that may benefit from the attempt at the good messages. Also, there seems to be a lot of effort put towards something they dislike so much. Don’t bother arguing with trolls, they probably just ran out of youtube videos to comment obscenely irrelevant comments at.
You know, I really needed a pick-me-up after the horrific conditions my family and I have been in the past few days due to Hurricane Sandy and felt so much better when I saw these photos. But thank you for ruining my image of humanity, Minky. I wish I was still ignorant to the fact you so carelessly informed us with, with no regard as to how it may impact the ones who NEEDED the faith these pictures gave. You, ma’am, suck.
Umm…Where do you get Hurricane Sandy from? Was it- Was it the guy with the basket of kittens? Maybe the broken window with the plastic or the guys saving a lamb from the ocean? I’m really wondering what the hell you are looking at, please…You just hurt my brain…
Hannah: it is very likely you are Chris / Ned Hardy. But in the unlikely circumstance that are are not then you are: (i) gullible & naive to believe all the above photos are genuine, and (ii) ridiculuos that you vent your disappointment that they are not at the person who posted the fact -> “don’t shoot the messenger”, rather blame the person who undertook the deception.
Not sure what to even make of this…My name is Chris, not Hannah….And I think gullibility can be placed on someone who proclaims fact and bases arguments on assumptions that I am (i) Some sort of admin based on some random smart-ass and not just some random guy who likes looking at images that make me feel good. And (ii) that I am so dead-set on proving a point that I would make multiple aliases to support the fact that not everyone is a cynical dick. Also, you seem to assume every single image presented above must be a fraudulent photoshop. Either that, or you don’t realize only 6 have captions and the rest are just photos. Probably just re-posted by whoever runs the site and not actually made by them. Talk about gullible. And just for clarification, I never stated that every image must be 100% authentic; just that you are an unfeeling ass-hat.