“We did not domesticate wheat. It domesticated us.”
― Yuval Noah Harari, Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind
In his book “Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind,” Yuval Noah Harari challenges the conventional notion that humans domesticated wheat through agriculture. Instead, he argues that wheat domesticated humans, fundamentally altering the course of human history and shaping our societies in ways we might not have anticipated.
Harari’s perspective is rooted in the idea that the agricultural revolution, which began around 10,000 years ago, was not necessarily a positive development for humans. Prior to agriculture, humans lived as hunter-gatherers, enjoying a diverse diet, a nomadic lifestyle, and relatively egalitarian social structures. The cultivation of wheat and other crops led to a significant shift in human existence, as people became tied to the land, working harder and longer hours to maintain their crops.
The domestication of wheat, according to Harari, created a series of cascading effects that transformed human societies. The need to protect and cultivate crops led to the development of private property, social hierarchies, and the concept of wealth accumulation. As agricultural societies grew and became more complex, they gave rise to cities, states, and empires, along with the associated issues of social inequality, warfare, and disease.
Harari also delves into the psychological impact of this transition. The constant need to manage and control the environment to ensure successful harvests introduced new forms of anxiety and stress. This was a stark contrast to the relative unpredictability but flexibility of a hunter-gatherer lifestyle.
The agricultural surplus allowed for population growth and the development of specialized professions. Not everyone needed to be involved in food production anymore, leading to the rise of artisans, soldiers, and leaders. This specialization was crucial for the development of complex societies but also led to increased social stratification and inequality.
Harari highlights that the need to manage and store surplus food led to the development of writing and record-keeping. Initially used to track grain storage and agricultural yields, these innovations evolved to support more complex administrative tasks, helping to build and maintain empires.
Furthermore, the transition to agriculture had significant environmental consequences. Large-scale farming led to deforestation, soil depletion, and a decrease in biodiversity. Humans began to manipulate their environment on an unprecedented scale, often with detrimental effects.
Agriculture also made human societies more dependent on specific crops and livestock, making them vulnerable to natural disasters, pests, and diseases. This dependency sometimes led to famine and societal collapse when crops failed.
The establishment of permanent settlements paved the way for the development of cities and urban centers. Urbanization was essential for the growth of civilizations but brought new challenges, such as the need for governance, infrastructure, and sanitation.
In essence, Harari’s provocative statement encourages readers to reexamine the narrative of human progress and question whether the agricultural revolution, symbolized by the domestication of wheat, truly served our best interests. It invites us to consider the unintended consequences of our actions and the ways in which our inventions and innovations can shape us as much as we shape them.