How much of our adult life is really just us trying to get the love we didn’t receive as kids?
More than most people realize.
Much of what plays out in adulthood—ambition, perfectionism, anxiety in relationships, difficulty trusting others, people-pleasing, or the aching need to be chosen—isn’t just about the present. It’s a continuation of a much older story. One that began long before there was language to explain it. When children don’t receive consistent, safe, unconditional love, they adapt. Not by asking for less, but by trying to become more of whatever seems lovable.
Children learn to perform, to achieve, to disappear, to make themselves easy or useful or invisible. Not because they’re manipulative or dramatic, but because their survival depends on staying connected to the people meant to care for them. When love is unpredictable, attention becomes currency. When love is conditional, approval becomes air.
Those adaptations don’t disappear with age. They simply evolve. What once looked like trying to be the “good kid” now shows up as the adult who overfunctions in every relationship. What once felt like walking on eggshells around a volatile parent now shows up as anxiety in romantic partnerships. What once was a child quietly wondering “Am I too much?” becomes the adult who apologizes for every need, every emotion, every moment of vulnerability.
Even as adults, many are still chasing the love they never received—only now, it’s through work, romantic partners, social validation, or trying to “fix” others in the hopes of finally feeling safe and seen.
The longing itself isn’t wrong. Wanting to be loved is deeply human. The pain comes not from the longing, but from trying to fill the original void in ways that are no longer healing—ways that continue to wound. Repeating old dynamics with new people. Seeking comfort in the same patterns that once caused harm.
True healing begins when that early deprivation is recognized for what it was—not a personal failure, but a lack. A child’s emotional needs left unmet, misunderstood, or minimized. It begins when the inner script changes from “If I just do better, I’ll be loved” to “I was worthy all along.”
Healing does not require erasing the past. It requires grieving it. Naming it. And then making new choices—slowly, imperfectly, but with increasing clarity. Choices that no longer hinge on earning love but on accepting it. Starting with self-compassion and extending outward.
So yes, much of adult life is shaped by the emotional blueprints of childhood. But awareness brings the power to redraw those lines. To stop chasing love that hurts, and to start receiving love that heals.
What is Attachment Theory?
Attachment theory isn’t some academic concept buried in a psych textbook. It’s the emotional blueprint you picked up before you could even speak—a way your nervous system learned to survive in the world of love, fear, closeness, and abandonment. It starts early, in the arms (or absence) of a caregiver, and it shapes how we connect with others for the rest of our lives—unless we make a conscious effort to understand and change it.
People who grew up with consistent, loving, emotionally available caregivers tend to develop what we call a secure attachment style. In their relationships, they’re generally comfortable with both intimacy and independence. They don’t get overly anxious when a partner is upset or distant, and they don’t fear that being close will smother them or make them weak. They learned, on a visceral level, that relationships are a safe place to land—and so they treat them that way.
But many of us didn’t grow up with that consistency. Maybe your caregiver sometimes tuned in to you, and other times didn’t. Maybe they were physically present but emotionally distant. Maybe they were warm one day and explosive the next. When love feels unreliable, you learn to become hyper-aware of your caregiver’s mood, to manage their reactions, to stay vigilant. And so, you become anxious. You might grow into someone who craves reassurance, who fears being too much but also not enough, who finds yourself obsessing over texts and feeling devastated by even small shifts in attention. The emotional stakes in relationships feel sky-high, because deep down you never knew when love might vanish.
Then there’s the opposite adaptation—the avoidant one. If closeness meant discomfort, neglect, or rejection, you might have learned to shut down. To not need too much. To rely on yourself and stay in control. Relationships start to feel dangerous not because you fear abandonment, but because you fear dependence. You become someone who values independence to the point of isolation, who pulls away when things get too intimate, who feels smothered by too much emotional expression. What looks like calm on the outside might actually be a well-practiced emotional shutdown on the inside.
And then, for some, the story is even more complicated. If the very person who was supposed to protect you was also a source of fear—because of abuse, trauma, or unpredictable chaos—your system might never have settled on a strategy. You wanted connection, but it hurt. You needed safety, but it wasn’t there. So now, in your adult relationships, you might find yourself swinging between desperate closeness and panicked withdrawal. You want to be loved, but the moment someone tries, it terrifies you. This is often called disorganized attachment, and it’s heartbreaking—but also understandable. It’s what happens when love and fear arrive in the same breath.
What’s important to know is that these styles aren’t life sentences. They’re not character flaws. They’re just patterns your younger self developed to stay safe in an environment that wasn’t always emotionally safe. And just as they were learned, they can be unlearned.
Some people who grew up with insecure attachments go on to develop what psychologists call “earned secure” attachment—through healing relationships, therapy, and self-work. They start to recognize their patterns and gently interrupt them. They learn that needs don’t make them needy, that closeness doesn’t mean suffocation, and that love doesn’t have to feel like a minefield.
Attachment theory isn’t about blaming your parents or diagnosing your partner. It’s about becoming aware of the story you’ve been living so that you can begin to write a new one. It’s about looking at your fears around intimacy and asking, “Where did I learn this? And is it still serving me now?”
At its core, this is the story of how we learn to love. And how, with enough compassion and curiosity, we can learn to love differently.
Why Is It So Hard to Communicate What We Really Need?
One of the most universal yet quietly devastating questions that surfaces in therapy is this: “Why can’t I just say what I need?” Sometimes people whisper it, as if needing something at all is a shameful confession. Other times, they blurt it out in frustration, after yet another relationship breakdown where they tried to hint, to imply, to be “low-maintenance”—and ended up feeling resentful, exhausted, or invisible.
And my response, every time, is this: Of course it’s hard.
Of course it’s hard to communicate your needs—because so many of us were taught early on that having needs at all was the problem.
Maybe you were raised in a home where emotions weren’t exactly welcomed. You had a need and were told you were being dramatic. You were sad and were told to smile. You were scared and were told to toughen up. The adults around you—well-meaning or not—sent a clear message: that your inner world was either too much, not enough, or simply inconvenient.
So you learned to contort. To suppress. To accommodate. You learned that it was safer to scan the room than to scan your own heart. That anticipating other people’s needs was more acceptable than expressing your own.
And now here you are: an adult with a job, a partner, a mortgage—maybe even a meditation app—and still struggling to say something as simple and human as: I need you to really listen to me right now or I feel disconnected and I don’t know how to say it without sounding needy.
The truth is, many people don’t struggle to communicate their needs because they’re “bad at relationships.” They struggle because they’ve been conditioned to feel like their needs are burdens. It’s not a communication issue—it’s an emotional safety issue.
We’re so used to ignoring ourselves that by the time we feel the impulse to say something, the need has already metastasized into something else: resentment, withdrawal, tears, sarcasm, maybe even rage. And then we judge ourselves for that, too—Why am I being so reactive? Why didn’t I just say something earlier?
And the answer is: because somewhere along the line, you were taught that your needs weren’t safe to share. Or worse, that they weren’t valid at all.
We think that needs will make us look weak. Or clingy. Or annoying. Or high-maintenance. But the irony is that unspoken needs don’t disappear—they just get louder. They build. They leak out sideways. They turn into fights about the dishes when what you really needed was to feel appreciated. They turn into long silences in the car when what you really wanted was to feel seen. They turn into breakups with people who never even knew what you were silently begging them for.
And then, sometimes in therapy, people finally say it. I want to feel like I matter. I want to know I’m not alone. I want to be loved in a way that feels like home, not like a performance.
And often, they cry. Not because they’re weak. But because, for the first time, they feel what it’s like to hear their own voice—to say something out loud that’s been living inside them for years. To let the truth land in the room, without apology.
So yes, it’s hard to communicate what we really need. But that doesn’t mean we can’t learn. That doesn’t mean we can’t begin to untangle the old stories we were taught about our worth. It doesn’t mean we can’t start practicing honesty—with ourselves first, and then with the people who want to know us more fully.
Because real connection starts not with perfection, but with honesty. With the bravery it takes to say: This is what I need. I’m scared to say it. But I’m saying it anyway.
And that one act—one sentence of truth—can begin to rewrite everything.
What Is Intergenerational Trauma?
Not every scar is visible. Not every wound is fresh. Some hurts are passed down so quietly, so subtly, that generations live inside them without even realizing they’re bleeding.
Intergenerational trauma is the emotional legacy of pain that isn’t resolved in one generation—and so it moves to the next. It’s the anxiety that seems to come out of nowhere. The hypervigilance that feels like second nature. The shame that lives in the body without a clear origin story. It’s what happens when emotional injuries go unspoken and unhealed, but not unfelt.
Sometimes it begins with something large and historical—a war, a genocide, colonization, slavery, forced displacement. Other times, it begins inside a family, behind closed doors—a parent who was abused, a grandparent who never learned how to nurture, a lineage of grief that never had space to be named.
And trauma, when it isn’t metabolized, finds other ways to live on.
A parent who never felt safe may become rigid and controlling. A grandparent who had to numb themselves to survive may struggle to show affection. A child growing up in that system may not know the specifics of the trauma, but they’ll know the silence. They’ll inherit the emotional tone—the unspoken fear, the vigilance, the tension. And they’ll adapt accordingly.
They’ll become emotionally attuned, or emotionally absent. They’ll overachieve or underfunction. They’ll learn that love is conditional or dangerous or rare. All without knowing the full story of where those messages came from.
What makes intergenerational trauma so difficult to name is that it often doesn’t belong to the person carrying it. It’s inherited like a ghost—through stories, behaviors, nervous systems, parenting styles, or what’s never spoken about at all. People grow up inside a kind of emotional weather system, never realizing they’ve been standing in a storm cloud that began decades before they were born.
But here’s the hopeful part: just because trauma can be passed down doesn’t mean healing can’t be too.
When someone begins to recognize the pattern—when they pause long enough to say, This pain didn’t start with me, but maybe it can stop with me—that is the beginning of change. Healing intergenerational trauma doesn’t mean blaming the past. It means understanding it. Grieving it. Creating space for new stories, new ways of relating, and new emotional legacies to take root.
Because the most courageous act may not be surviving trauma. It may be choosing not to pass it on.
Is it possible to feel truly secure in a relationship if security was never modeled in childhood?
Yes—but not without intention, awareness, and a willingness to learn what was never taught.
Security in a relationship isn’t just about how someone treats you. It’s about how safe you feel being seen. It’s about the quiet trust that develops when needs are acknowledged rather than ignored, when conflict doesn’t threaten the foundation, and when closeness isn’t something to run from or cling to in fear.
But what happens when a person grows up without that kind of safety? When love came with conditions, or connection was inconsistent, or needs were met with punishment, silence, or chaos?
That person may grow into an adult who craves intimacy but fears it. Who confuses anxiety with passion, or distance with strength. Who feels suffocated by love one moment and invisible the next. And underneath all of that is a nervous system that simply doesn’t know how to rest in safety—because it was never allowed to.
And still—people can learn.
Security can be learned, not just felt. It can be practiced, not just inherited. The absence of a model doesn’t mean the absence of possibility.
Learning to feel secure in a relationship begins with unlearning what safety used to mean. For many, safety once meant shutting down. Staying small. Staying alert. It meant watching, adapting, bracing. But security in adulthood asks something else entirely. It asks for softness. For slowness. For honesty. It asks for vulnerability—not all at once, but in small, manageable moments that begin to prove something new: I can be close to someone, and I don’t have to disappear to keep them close.
That kind of emotional re-patterning often takes time. Sometimes therapy helps. Sometimes it’s a patient, emotionally available partner who shows up again and again. Often it’s a mix of both. But healing doesn’t require a perfect partner—it requires a relationship where both people are willing to name what they didn’t get, and choose not to pass that absence forward.
So yes, it is absolutely possible to feel secure in love—even if security was never modeled. But it’s not about luck or finding “the right person” who fixes it all. It’s about learning to stay present with the parts of yourself that were once abandoned—and choosing, over and over again, not to abandon them again.
That’s what builds safety. That’s what builds connection. That’s what makes love not just something people survive—but something they can finally trust.
Related Posts:
