Joseph P. Kennedy, left, U.S. Ambassador to Great Britain, stands with his 20 year old son, John F. Kennedy, in New York, January 5, 1938
This is one of those moments where, if you could freeze time, you’d see a kind of fork in the American timeline quietly forming beneath the polished shoes and pressed coats.
Joseph P. Kennedy Sr.—sharp, ambitious, and already calculating three moves ahead—stands next to his 20-year-old son, John. The photograph is still. But history is anything but.
At this moment, nobody knows what’s coming. Not the war, not the tragedy, not the presidency, and certainly not the myth. What we’re looking at here isn’t Camelot. It’s a family dynasty in the early phases of its own ruthless construction. Joe Kennedy isn’t thinking small. He’s not thinking about raising nice kids or settling into retirement. He’s thinking empire. Influence. Power. He’s just gotten the plum assignment of U.S. Ambassador to the Court of St. James—essentially the most prestigious diplomatic post America had to offer at the time—and he’s not wasting the photo op. His son is there, standing not beside him as a boy, but as an apprentice.
But here’s where things get eerie. John’s not even supposed to be the one. The Kennedy legacy—whatever that was going to be—was built around his older brother, Joe Jr. He was the golden child. Groomed from the start. Harvard. War hero material. The one Dad was betting on.
But wars, as they often do, have a way of rewriting blueprints. Joe Jr. would be killed in 1944, flying a mission he volunteered for that even the military admitted was dangerously experimental. The favored son was gone, and the spotlight, reluctant or not, shifted to John.
In this photo, that hasn’t happened yet. John is still the second son, the quieter one, already plagued by illness, often underestimated. He hasn’t yet been forced into the role of “the one who must carry the name.” But it’s coming. And you have to wonder—how does that weigh on a person? When your life path is yanked out of your hands by fate, by family legacy, by a father with ambitions that burn hotter than your own?
This isn’t a picture of destiny. It’s a picture of pressure. Of expectation. Of the machinery of American dynastic politics warming up in the background, long before the rest of the country would see it coming.
And the irony? This moment—two Kennedys standing stiffly for a photograph in New York—is as close to peace as this story ever gets.
Flanders front. Gas attack, September, 1917
The fog that rolled over the fields that morning was not of nature’s making. It came low and clinging, yellow-gray and bloated with death. A windless quiet pressed down on the Flanders front, broken only by the hiss of canisters and the sudden, collective rasp of men reaching for their masks.
From the churned mud and broken trenches emerged the shapes of soldiers—figures more silhouette than human, their faces hidden behind round glass and rubber. They moved like phantoms through the haze, rifles clenched, lungs burning beneath the protection that could only ever be partial. The gas always found the cracks.
To watch them was to watch inevitability unfold. Each step forward came not from courage, but from momentum—an obedience born of numbness. The war had long since ceased to be about nations or borders. It had become mechanical, a repetition of charges and counter-charges, of gains measured in yards and paid for in limbs.
The cloud swirled around them, swallowing some whole. One man, his gear dangling from his belt, staggered briefly and dropped. No shot had rung out. There was no cry. Just the sound of his body hitting the earth, and the silence that followed.
In the distance, beyond the veil of poison, the outline of another world shimmered—trees untouched, sky still blue, a field not yet cratered. But it may as well have been a dream. Here, in the real, the men advanced not as soldiers, but as relics of some older logic, their humanity eroded by weeks of rain, lice, and fear.
There would be no victory in this charge. Only more names for the casualty reports, more numbers for the morning roll call to subtract. The gas would lift eventually, but it would not leave. Its taste, its memory, would settle into the fabric of their clothes, their minds, their sleep.
And still, they moved forward.
Yang Kyoungjong, the only known soldier to have fought on three sides of a war, 1944
You ever hear a story so strange, so improbable, that your first instinct is to think this has to be a myth? And yet, every so often, history delivers something so bizarre, so painfully human, that it snaps into place with a weird sort of logic.
That’s the story of Yang Kyoungjong, a Korean man who, by 1944, had served in the Imperial Japanese Army, been conscripted into the Soviet Red Army, and then forcibly drafted into the German Wehrmacht—all in the same war.
This isn’t a “rags to riches” tale. It’s not a war movie screenplay with a satisfying third act. This is history as a meat grinder. It’s what happens when a human being becomes a piece of flotsam in the tidal wave of 20th-century geopolitics.
So let’s rewind.
In 1938, Yang was just 18 years old, living in Japanese-occupied Korea. Japan drafts him—because they can—and sends him to fight against the Soviet Union at the Battle of Khalkhin Gol. If you’ve never heard of it, that’s because it wasn’t a glamorous front. It was a brutal, dusty, forgotten war between two empires feeling each other out in Mongolia. The Japanese lose. Yang is captured.
Now he’s a prisoner of the Soviets. And Stalin doesn’t really do Geneva Conventions. So instead of sending him home, they throw him into a gulag. Then, when things start going south in Europe, they empty the camps and draft the prisoners—including Yang—into the Red Army. Next thing he knows, he’s on a train heading west, wearing Soviet boots, fighting the Nazis in Ukraine.
Then the Germans capture him.
And here’s where it gets surreal. The Nazis, desperate for manpower by 1944, start conscripting POWs from the Eastern Front into their own ranks. They call them Hiwis—“volunteer assistants”—but most of these men weren’t volunteering for anything. Yang ends up on the beaches of Normandy, wearing a German uniform, manning a defensive position during the D-Day invasion. He is captured again, this time by American paratroopers, who take one look at him and assume he’s Japanese and in the German army, which, understandably, fries a few brain circuits.
This is the stuff of Catch-22, only it’s real. No ideology. No nationalism. Just a man bounced like a pinball across the deadliest conflict in human history.
Yang survives the war. He ends up in a U.S. POW camp in Britain, and eventually emigrates to the United States, where he disappears into the quiet anonymity of post-war life.
Think about that. Three armies. Three uniforms. Three languages. One man. And not once was it his choice.
This isn’t just a historical oddity. It’s a brutal reminder of how small individual lives can become in the jaws of empire and war. Yang Kyoungjong didn’t fight for causes—he fought through them, because the alternative was dying on the side of a road in some country he’d never heard of.
Cixi sits in a sedan chair, surrounded by eunuchs, circa 1903-04. Rumor has it that Cixi bribed the eunuchs to get better access to the emperor. Out of dozens of concubines, Cixi was the only one to bear a child.
There’s an old photograph—grainy, regal, and a little surreal. It shows a woman sitting in a sedan chair, her posture composed, her expression unreadable. Around her, a circle of eunuchs. Servants, yes—but also symbols of power. Of control. Of the centuries-old machinery of imperial China.
The woman is Cixi, and if you only know her as an empress or a footnote in late Qing history, you’re missing the point. She didn’t just live through one of the most turbulent eras of Chinese history—she outmaneuvered it. This photo isn’t just about ceremony. It’s about victory. Because behind that chair is one of the most staggering political power plays in modern history.
So let’s set the stage.
In 1851, Cixi was just one of dozens of teenage girls shipped into the Forbidden City as potential imperial concubines. Think about that for a second. Dozens of girls, all competing for the attention of a man—the emperor—who had absolute power, but very little actual intimacy with anyone. The odds of being noticed were microscopic. The odds of mattering? Practically zero.
And yet Cixi pulls it off.
Rumor—persistent, whispered through generations—says she bribed the eunuchs to gain better access to the emperor. That’s not a detail to gloss over. Eunuchs were the gatekeepers. They controlled who saw the emperor, who whispered in his ear, who got remembered. And Cixi, understanding the power behind the throne, understood them.
Then, the bombshell: she becomes the only concubine to bear the emperor a son.
Boom. That changes everything.
When the emperor dies in 1861, it’s her son—not someone else’s—who inherits the throne. He’s just a kid, so a regency is formed. And Cixi? She isn’t content being the boy’s mother. She becomes Empress Dowager, the de facto ruler of China for the next four decades.
Four decades.
Let that sink in. A woman with no official standing at the start of her journey ends up pulling the strings of a decaying empire while European powers, internal rebellions, and modernization swirl like a hurricane around her.
She survives coups. She suppresses reformers. She plays conservative factions off progressive ones. She fights off those who would sideline her and punishes those who underestimate her. Her legacy is complicated—some call her a reactionary who stalled China’s modernization, others see her as a shrewd operator doing what she could to hold the collapsing Qing system together.
But either way, the audacity is breathtaking.
That photo, the one with the eunuchs? That’s not just Cixi being carried—it’s a visual declaration of dominance. A woman who started out as one of many, who was supposed to remain voiceless, becomes the immovable center of an empire. She turned palace survival into an art form. Political manipulation into a weapon. And motherhood into a throne.
Say what you will about her—but she won the game. And almost no one else even knew they were playing.
The Heavy Gustav, Hitler and generals inspecting the largest caliber rifled weapon ever used in combat, 1941
A train is parked on a custom-built track. Not a passenger train. Not a freight line. But a monster. A steel leviathan that looks like it belongs in a fever dream about industrial apocalypse.
Hitler is there, standing with his generals, dwarfed by the machine in front of them. Cameras flash. Officers salute. Technicians buzz around like ants. The object of their admiration? The Schwerer Gustav—also known as Heavy Gustav—a weapon so absurdly large, so mechanically complex, that its very existence seems like a punchline from some dystopian parody.
But it was real.
And it fired.
Let’s get into it….
Gustav wasn’t just a big gun. It was the largest caliber rifled weapon ever fielded.
We’re talking a barrel nearly 100 feet long, weighing over 1,300 tons, mounted on a multi-track rail system, and firing 7-ton shells over 20 miles. That’s not a typo. Each shell was the size of a small car and had to be lifted into the breach by cranes. It required a crew of 2500 men just to operate, plus thousands more to lay the rail lines and set up firing positions.
Why build such a weapon?
Because Nazi Germany, under Hitler’s personal obsession with superweapons, believed that sheer force could replace strategy. They believed if they could just blast through the unblastable, they could break history.
Schwerer Gustav was originally built to crack the Maginot Line—France’s fortress wall. But by the time it was ready, France had fallen and the Maginot Line had been sidestepped. So it sat, useless, until Hitler decided to haul it east to the siege of Sevastopol in 1942.
It would fire just 48 shells in combat.
Fortresses were flattened. Underground bunkers vaporized. One shell reportedly punched through 100 feet of reinforced concrete and another blew up an ammo depot buried under a mountain.
And then… silence.
Gustav couldn’t move quickly. It couldn’t be used flexibly. Every time it was deployed, it needed weeks of prep and attracted every Allied bomber within range. And so, like many of Hitler’s weapons dreams—the Maus tank, the V3 cannon, the Amerika Bomber—Gustav became a symbol of the war’s dark fetish for technological spectacle over strategic sense.
That photo—Hitler and his generals standing in the shadow of this steel behemoth—is telling. It’s not about tactics. It’s about domination. It’s a propaganda moment. A statement: Look at what we can build. Look at what we can do. But the irony is brutal: in a war that would be won with mobility, logistics, and attrition, Gustav was a monument to overkill, not a tool of victory.
In the end, Schwerer Gustav was too big to matter. It was never captured in one piece. Some say it was destroyed by retreating German troops, others that it was bombed. Its remains were found by the Allies, half-buried, half-dismembered. Like a prehistoric skeleton from a forgotten age of monsters.
What do you do with a machine that size in a war like that?
The answer is: nothing that makes sense.
But that’s what makes it fascinating. Schwerer Gustav is war’s cathedral—pointless, grand, insane. A monument not to military necessity, but to ego, obsession, and the terrifying things we can build when limits fall away.
Related Posts:
