What did it feel like to be a civilian during a Mongol invasion
Imagine waking up to the sound of hooves. Not dozens. Thousands. The ground literally shaking beneath your feet. You’re in a town you’ve known your whole life—maybe a farming village, maybe a walled city with guards and watchtowers—and someone on the edge of town starts screaming that they’re here. You don’t need to ask who.
Because by now, everyone in the region knows exactly who the Mongols are. Not from maps or proclamations. From stories whispered by refugees. Entire cities burned to the ground. Populations erased. Heads stacked like pyramids at the gates. Survivors? Rare. Sometimes a single merchant would make it out, barely alive, and tell stories that sounded less like war and more like apocalypse.
So what did it feel like? It felt like the end of the world.
There’s panic. Chaos. Some people run—grab their kids, their elderly parents, whatever they can carry. Others pray. Maybe your city sends envoys with gifts, gold, horses—anything to buy time or mercy. But with the Mongols, that mercy is conditional. Submit before they arrive, and you might survive. Resist, even slightly, and they will make an example of you.
You might not even get the chance to surrender. Their tactics were so fast, so coordinated, so psychologically devastating that by the time you realize they’re near, it’s already too late. Arrows begin raining from the sky. Fire follows. The screams are immediate. Horses crashing through the streets. Soldiers that seem less like men and more like ghosts with blades. They don’t speak your language. They don’t look like anyone you’ve ever seen. And they don’t stop.
And if your city holds out? If the walls do their job? That’s not hope. That’s delay. The Mongols were siege geniuses. They’d bring in engineers, dig tunnels, build towers, starve you out. Days, weeks—it didn’t matter. They would break through. And when they did, the slaughter was systematic. The killing wasn’t random. It was deliberate, designed to send a message to the next town over: don’t resist.
But here’s the darkest part. Even if you survived, you didn’t really escape. You might be enslaved. Taken far from your home. Your culture erased. Your identity crushed under a new system, a new ruler, a new fear.
Being a civilian during a Mongol invasion wasn’t just terrifying—it was existential. It was watching your world dissolve in real time, knowing that no one was coming to help, and that everything you understood about safety, about civilization, about order, was a lie the moment their banners appeared on the horizon.
How close did we actually come to total nuclear annihilation during the Cold War?
Imagine you’re living in a world where one guy’s hangover or a radar glitch could quite literally end civilization. That’s how close we came to nuclear annihilation during the Cold War. Not in theory. Not in some over-dramatized Hollywood thriller. But in real, documented events that were inches, seconds, or mistaken assumptions away from catastrophe.
Let’s start with the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962—not because it’s the only moment, but because it’s one of the few times when people knew how close we were. What most don’t realize is that during those thirteen days, there was a Soviet submarine commander named Vasili Arkhipov who refused to authorize the launch of a nuclear torpedo while under pressure from American depth charges. The launch required unanimous consent of three officers. Two said yes. Arkhipov said no. That’s one man. One decision. That’s how fragile this whole thing was.
And then there’s 1983—Stanislav Petrov, a Soviet lieutenant colonel, sitting in a bunker, sees warning lights flashing on his screen: the United States has launched five nuclear missiles. Soviet protocol said launch a counterstrike immediately. But Petrov—on nothing but gut instinct—declared it a false alarm. Turns out he was right. It was a satellite error caused by sunlight bouncing off clouds. Again, one man, one moment. No nuclear war.
It’s easy, in hindsight, to think the Cold War was a chess match of brilliant minds and cool-headed strategy. But in reality, it was a Jenga tower stacked with human error, paranoia, and broken communication systems. There were dozens—dozens—of near misses. Misread radar signals. War games mistaken for real attacks. Missiles accidentally armed or launched. We weren’t dancing on the edge. We were flipping a coin, over and over again, and somehow it just never came up tails.
So how close did we come? Closer than most people will ever be comfortable knowing. Close enough that history didn’t just bend at those moments—it held its breath.
Why were ancient battles so unimaginably brutal—and why did people keep showing up to fight them?
It’s one of the most disturbing paradoxes of human history: for thousands of years, people showed up—sometimes eagerly—to hack each other apart with swords, axes, and spears, often in ways so horrific they wouldn’t make it past a modern movie rating board. Limbs lopped off. Entrails spilled. Faces crushed with maces. And this wasn’t some spontaneous riot. These were organized. Announced. People marched to them like they were going to a wedding. Why?
First, ancient battles were brutal because the weapons and the tactics left no room for distance or detachment. There were no drones. No laser-guided missiles. It was iron and bronze colliding with flesh and bone. Warfare was up close, personal, and sensory in the most terrifying way—screams, blood, the smell of shit and death. And there was no Geneva Convention to keep things “humane.” Taking prisoners was rare. Mercy was uncommon. And once the line broke? The real killing began.
But here’s the kicker—people kept showing up. Over and over again. Why?
Because most of them didn’t have a choice. Many ancient armies were made up of peasants levied by kings, or citizens legally obligated to fight. And desertion didn’t mean a dishonorable discharge—it meant your village got torched or your family enslaved. Others showed up because war, brutal as it was, offered a rare shot at power, plunder, or glory. In a world where 90% of people would live and die in the same mud-brick village, war was one of the few ways to change your fate.
And we also have to account for the worldviews of the time. Honor. Duty. Religion. Identity. If your city-state called, you answered—not just out of fear, but because your whole sense of self was tied to it. You didn’t think of yourself as an individual first. You were a Spartan. A Roman. A Frank. That wasn’t nationalism. That was existence.
So yes, ancient battles were unimaginably brutal. But they weren’t some aberration. They were a ritual of human history—driven by coercion, hope, identity, and fear. And in many ways, what’s more disturbing than how bloody those battles were… is how normal they felt to the people in them.
What if Hitler had died in WWI?
It’s one of those historical what-ifs that haunts anyone who’s cracked open a history book with even a passing interest in World War II: what if Adolf Hitler had taken a bullet to the head in the trenches of World War I? Or succumbed to gas. Or dysentery. Or any of the random horrors that claimed millions of others. Would the Holocaust have happened? Would we have had World War II?
The easy answer—the comforting one—is to say no. That Hitler was the singular catalyst. That if he had died in the mud of the Western Front, six million Jews might not have been murdered, tens of millions of others might not have perished, and Europe might have avoided a second bloodbath. But history rarely gives us clean alternatives like that. The world Hitler rose in was already a firestorm of instability, resentment, and wounded pride. Germany was a defeated empire, humiliated by Versailles, crushed economically, and convulsing in political chaos. Someone was going to ride that storm.
But here’s the thing—Hitler wasn’t inevitable. The conditions that gave rise to him? Maybe. But the man himself? That blend of charisma, grievance, megalomania, and sheer oratory genius? That wasn’t baked into the system. Plenty of right-wing authoritarians tried to tap into the same anger in postwar Germany. None of them had quite his ability to turn rage into religion.
Without Hitler, the Nazi Party likely remains a fringe group of violent weirdos with matching shirts and too many conspiracy theories. Maybe Germany slides into a different kind of authoritarianism—a military junta, or a monarchy revival attempt. Maybe there’s still war. Maybe even genocide. But not that war. Not that genocide. Hitler personalized the apocalypse. His obsessions—about Jews, about Lebensraum, about Slavs—drove the Nazis to do things that weren’t just strategic or political, but fanatical. The kind of stuff that goes beyond realpolitik into madness.
So yes, if Hitler had died in WWI, the world would still have been a dangerous, unstable place. But it probably wouldn’t have exploded in quite the same way. The fuse would still be there. But the hand holding the match? Gone. And that might’ve been just enough.
Do we actually learn from history, or are we just watching different civilizations make the same mistakes on a new stage?
The idea that we learn from history is almost a sacred tenet in modern education. Politicians invoke it. Professors teach it. We print it on coffee mugs and plaster it on motivational posters—“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” But if that were really true, if remembering the past were enough, then how do we explain the 20th century alone? Two world wars. Genocides on every inhabited continent. Dictators rising from economic collapse like clockwork. All while the books from the previous century were still warm on the shelves.
See, we don’t lack historical knowledge. We lack historical application. The people in 1914 read about Napoleon. The people in 1933 knew about World War I. Many in 2003 had read about Vietnam. And yet… on we march.
What happens over and over is this: each generation believes its situation is unique. That the lessons of history are interesting but not directly applicable. That they are different. That they are more rational, more informed, more ethical. That modern systems and modern minds are immune to the madness of their ancestors. And yet, under pressure, under fear, under the illusion of exceptionalism, they fall into the same psychological traps.
Take empire. How many times have civilizations overextended themselves—militarily, economically, administratively—trying to hold onto power they no longer have the infrastructure to sustain? Athens did it. Rome did it. The British Empire did it. The Soviets did it. And yet, the idea that we might be doing it now is often brushed off as cynicism or anti-patriotism. But it’s not. It’s precedent.
And then there’s inequality. Again and again, societies allow wealth and power to pool at the top, while the masses grow disillusioned, angry, and susceptible to demagogues. You can trace that arc through the fall of the Roman Republic, the French Revolution, Tsarist Russia, and even parts of today’s world. And every time, people in power seem baffled when the pitchforks come out.
The uncomfortable truth is that history isn’t a classroom—it’s a mirror. And what it reflects is not the lessons we’ve learned, but the behaviors we keep repeating. It’s not just the “great men” of history who screw it up. It’s the system. The psychology. The culture. It’s us. The mistakes persist not because we’re stupid, but because we’re human. And being human means being emotional, short-term thinkers with tribal instincts and a deep aversion to uncertainty.
So no, we don’t really learn from history in the way we wish we did. We’re not evolving in a neat, upward spiral. It’s more like a loop—with just enough progress to keep us hopeful, and just enough recurrence to keep the historians awake at night.
What we can do, if we’re willing, is try to recognize the patterns faster. Catch the early warning signs. Build systems with historical humility baked in. But that takes effort. That takes leadership. That takes a culture willing to listen to the past not as a bedtime story—but as a warning siren.
And how often does that happen? Well… you tell me.
Related Posts:
