Why did soldiers keep fighting in WWI, even when it became clear they were marching into slaughter?
Why did they keep going?
Why, after seeing entire regiments mowed down in minutes, after watching friends disintegrate under artillery, after spending weeks in flooded trenches with rats chewing on corpses—why did they keep fighting?
Because World War I wasn’t just a war. It was a system. A machine. And once you were inside of it, there was no clear way out.
Most of these men weren’t professional soldiers. They were farm boys, factory workers, teachers. They didn’t sign up knowing what they were walking into. No one did. Not really. The governments promised quick victories and glorious returns. They got mud. Disease. Barbed wire. A kind of industrialized killing the world had never seen before.
Now imagine this: You’re 19 years old, buried in a trench somewhere in the Somme. The guy next to you has trench foot. The one before him had his face melted off by mustard gas. You hear the whistle blow. You know what it means. Over the top. Into No Man’s Land. Into machine guns. Into certain death.
So why do you climb the ladder?
Because that’s the only world left.
Desertion? They’ll shoot you. Disobey an order? You go to prison, or worse, they send you into a punishment battalion and give you a shovel instead of a rifle. And anyway, what are you going to do—run home? Where is home? What’s left of it?
And it’s not just fear. It’s habit. That’s the terrifying part. You get used to it. To crawling through corpses. To eating stale bread next to a bloated horse. The line between sanity and madness gets thinner by the day. And once you’re numb enough, you stop questioning. You follow orders. You survive today so you can survive tomorrow. Maybe.
But here’s the real kicker—you’re not fighting for the war effort anymore. Not for your country. Not for ideology. That stuff dies in the first week. You’re fighting for the guy next to you. For your unit. For the guy who covered you when the trench collapsed. The guy who shared his last cigarette. The one who cried with you the night the shell landed in the latrine and killed your best friend.
That kind of bond is primal. It’s tribal. It turns the war into something personal. You don’t want to let that guy down. You don’t want to be the one who broke.
And all the while, the generals keep believing in breakthroughs. One more push. One more offensive. They don’t see what’s happening on the ground. That this isn’t a campaign—it’s a meat grinder. You throw in 50,000 men, maybe you gain 200 yards. Then you lose them next week and throw in 50,000 more.
The soldiers weren’t stupid. They knew.
They fought because they had to. Because the only other option was to surrender to chaos—and maybe to their own minds.
They didn’t fight because they believed the war made sense.
They fought because once you’re in hell, all you can do is keep walking.
Why did European leaders walk blindly into a world war that none of them actually wanted?
They didn’t intend to destroy the world they lived in.
That’s the most important thing to understand when you look back at the summer of 1914. The kings, emperors, foreign ministers, and generals who set the wheels of World War I in motion weren’t sociopaths looking for destruction. They were men operating inside a system—one that was fragile, prideful, and tragically outdated for the modern world.
European diplomacy at the time was like a web of tripwires. The alliances were tangled. Austria-Hungary was tied to Germany. Russia was sworn to protect Serbia. France had an ironclad agreement with Russia. Britain had obligations to Belgium and France. No one could move without pulling someone else in.
And the thing is—none of these countries wanted a world war. They wanted to maintain their power, their credibility, and their reputations. They wanted to deter aggression. But in trying to protect their positions, they created a system where even a small spark—like the assassination of an archduke in a faraway Balkan city—could ignite an uncontrollable fire.
The logic of war had been rehearsed long before a single shot was fired. Every major power had a mobilization plan, and those plans were rigid. Once a country began to move troops, the others felt they had no choice but to do the same. Delay meant weakness. Hesitation meant defeat. Leaders believed that speed was survival—and that if they didn’t strike first, they might not be able to strike at all.
So when Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, Russia mobilized to protect its Slavic ally. Germany, seeing Russian troops mobilize, activated its plan to invade France through Belgium before France could fully respond. France mobilized in response to Germany. Britain, bound by treaty and horrified by the violation of Belgian neutrality, joined the fight.
Each country believed it was acting in self-defense.
Each country believed the war would be short.
Each country thought they had no choice.
They were wrong on all counts.
What followed wasn’t just a war. It was a collapse. The collapse of the old European order. The collapse of the idea that technology and progress would naturally lead to peace. The collapse of empires, of ideals, and of millions of individual lives—soldiers, civilians, nurses, children.
And it happened not because of one evil genius pulling strings—but because a group of proud, powerful men made decisions that felt rational in the moment, and fatal in hindsight.
They didn’t see the future clearly. They didn’t grasp how industrial warfare would change everything. They didn’t realize that by the time the war ended, the world they were trying to protect would be unrecognizable—and in many ways, gone for good.
That’s how you walk blindly into a world war you never actually wanted.
You assume someone else will stop it.
You think you can manage it.
And by the time you realize you can’t—it’s already far too late.
What was it like to be a Russian peasant stuck between the Nazis and the Red Army?
The Russian peasant of the Second World War lived in a landscape where survival had very little to do with right or wrong—and everything to do with luck, silence, and brutal adaptation.
When the Wehrmacht swept through the western Soviet Union in 1941, many peasants greeted the Germans not with resistance, but with cautious relief. To them, Stalin had already been a predator. Collectivization had ripped away their land. The famine of the early 1930s—the Holodomor—had hollowed out entire villages. The NKVD had taken their fathers, their sons, and anyone with an extra cow or a hint of independence. So when German soldiers arrived with clean uniforms and tight formations, promising the end of Bolshevism, some peasants hoped, desperately, for a reprieve.
That hope was short-lived.
The Nazi occupation was not liberation. It was annihilation disguised as order. The German Army was followed by the SS and the Einsatzgruppen. Villages were plundered for food and firewood. Men and women were rounded up for forced labor and shipped to Germany. Partisan activity—real or imagined—was answered with reprisal massacres. Entire villages were burned to the ground, their residents shot or herded into barns and set alight. Rape was common. So was starvation. For the average peasant, the Nazi regime was not a faceless machinery of war—it was something you could hear in your barn, smell in the burning fields, and see in the dead eyes of your neighbors.
But escape offered no safety.
As the Red Army pushed west to reclaim lost territory, they brought their own form of terror. Stalin had issued strict orders: any Soviet citizen who had remained behind enemy lines was a potential traitor. The logic was merciless—if you had survived, you must have collaborated. Recovered villages were often greeted not with aid but with interrogation, deportation, and sometimes execution. Men were conscripted back into the Red Army without training, often sent to punishment battalions—the shtrafbats—where survival rates were abysmal. Women, especially young women, were subject to widespread sexual violence at the hands of Soviet soldiers. It is a truth often sanitized in patriotic memory, but in the raw documents of the time—in the letters, the reports, the testimonies—it is undeniable.
Caught between two totalitarian systems, the Russian peasant had no refuge. They buried valuables and sometimes family members under floorboards. They learned to avoid both sides, to say as little as possible, to hide young girls in cellars when soldiers passed through. They walked for miles for a loaf of bread, only to have it taken by the next unit of soldiers. They lived in houses where the windows were stuffed with rags instead of glass, in clothes patched until nothing original remained, always cold, always hungry, and always afraid.
It is tempting, in hindsight, to view them as passive victims. But many fought back in ways they could. Some joined partisan groups. Others sabotaged quietly—breaking tools, misleading officers, hiding fugitives. But more often, resistance took the form of endurance. They survived by sheer force of will.
To be a Russian peasant between the Nazis and the Red Army was to be treated as both expendable and dangerous. You were not just a casualty of war; you were a suspect in someone else’s ideology. Your survival wasn’t heroic. It was unsanitary, miserable, humiliating. But it was still survival.
And for many, that was the only victory they could hope for.
What was it like to lose your farm to the Dust Bowl and flee west with nothing?
It wasn’t a single moment, like a fire or a flood. It was slow. That’s the cruel part. You could’ve lived with a fire. You could’ve fought a flood. But the dust? The dust was patient. It crept into everything. Into your lungs, into your food, into the cracks of your windows and the corners of your soul.
At first, you didn’t believe it could take everything.
The rains stopped one year, but that happens sometimes. You figure it’ll come back the next. So you plow. You sow. You keep the faith. And when the crops fail, you tell yourself you’ll try again. You’re a farmer. That’s what you do.
But the second year comes. Then the third. And by the fourth, hope becomes something dangerous to carry around.
The sky turns the color of old pennies. The air is thick, dry, bitter. And the land—the land that once fed your family, the land your father worked and his father before him—turns against you. Your wheat withers to nothing. The cows drop dead or get sold for near it. You bury one child and watch another cough through a damp cloth tied around her face.
You can’t breathe without coughing. You can’t eat without scraping.
And then the men come. The bank men, the company men, the men in suits and ties who don’t know the name of the town but carry maps with lines drawn through your land. They say it’s over. You borrowed too much. You can’t stay. And it doesn’t matter if your family’s been there since before Oklahoma was Oklahoma.
They don’t want you. The land doesn’t want you.
So you pack.
Not everything, of course. There’s no room for everything. You take what fits. A mattress strapped to the roof. A skillet. A coffee can full of nickels. You leave behind the piano, the rocking chair, the corner of the house where your baby took her first steps.
And then you point the truck west.
California. They say there’s work there. Orchards and lettuce fields. Rows of green stretching out under soft skies. They say you can get a fresh start if you can just make it.
But the road is long. The car’s tired. The kids are hungry. And when you get there—when you finally cross the desert and see that wide land rolling out before you—you find the signs: No Okies. No Bums. No Jobs.
You’re not wanted there either.
But you still pick. You pick peaches until your hands bleed. You work from sunrise to dusk for a dime and a slice of bread. You live in a camp built out of scraps, with twenty people to a faucet and no law that doesn’t come with a club. You lose your pride piece by piece, until all that’s left is a kind of quiet fury.
And yet…
You keep going. You carry your child on your hip. You light a fire under a tin can and call it supper. You hold your wife when the babies are asleep and you both pretend, for just a minute, that the world hasn’t swallowed you whole.
Because you still believe, deep down, that the land can be good again. That something better waits on the other side of the next sunrise. Because hope, once it gets inside you, is hard to kill.
Even after the dust.
Why did the Mongols conquer so much—and then disappear?
Imagine a tribe of horsemen from the Central Asian steppe—illiterate, scattered, often at war with one another—rising in the span of just a few decades to create the largest contiguous land empire the world has ever seen.
How do you even begin to explain that?
Well, you start with this: the Mongols weren’t just conquerors—they were a force of nature.
Their rise wasn’t inevitable, but it was explosive once it started. Under Genghis Khan—a man as ruthless as he was strategic—they became a military machine unlike anything the world had seen. Fast. Adaptive. Unpredictable. They used terror as a weapon, yes—but they also used brilliance. Logistics, espionage, psychological warfare. They didn’t just burn cities—they offered surrender terms, exploited divisions, turned enemies into allies.
Genghis didn’t build an army. He built a system. Merit over blood. Loyalty over heritage. Mobility over tradition. He unified the tribes through blood and promise—then pointed them outward.
And what followed… was devastation.
The Khwarezmian Empire. Gone. Baghdad—the cultural and intellectual capital of the Islamic world—reduced to ashes in a matter of days. Cities that refused to surrender were wiped out so thoroughly that their names vanished from maps. In some cases, their languages did too.
But here’s the thing—this wasn’t random violence. This was policy. The Mongols operated on a kind of brutal logic: resist and be destroyed, submit and be integrated. They brought stability to the Silk Road. They offered religious tolerance. They spread technologies—gunpowder, papermaking, printing—across continents.
So how did they disappear?
They didn’t—not entirely. But the system that made them unbeatable in war wasn’t built to manage peace.
After Genghis died, the empire was split between his descendants—the “four khanates”—and that’s where things started to unravel. Without the unifying force of one supreme leader, internal rivalries broke out. Mongol identity diluted as they settled in Persia, China, and Russia, absorbing the cultures they had once conquered.
And with power came something new: luxury.
The Mongols who grew up in yurts on the open steppe—the warriors who drank fermented mare’s milk and rode 100 miles a day—suddenly found themselves living in palaces, surrounded by courtiers and taxes and bureaucracy. They became emperors, not raiders.
Then came disease.
The same trade routes the Mongols had opened and secured helped spread the Black Death. It tore through Asia and Europe, but it also ravaged the empire from within. Populations collapsed. Trade ground to a halt. And the very connectedness that had made the Mongol Empire strong now made it vulnerable.
By the 14th century, the illusion of one Mongol Empire had shattered. The Yuan Dynasty in China was overthrown by native Chinese rebels. The Ilkhanate in Persia dissolved. The Golden Horde splintered. Only in Central Asia did the name linger for a while longer—but the storm had passed.
So why did they disappear?
Because empires built on momentum eventually stop moving. Because when the horsemen got off their horses, they forgot what made them dangerous. Because the terrifying unity of the early Mongol war machine couldn’t survive the very success it had created.
But for a brief, brutal, astonishing moment in history, the world was theirs.
And everyone else lived in fear of hoofbeats on the horizon.
Related Posts:
