Graduating class in Voronezh USSR 1941. Only 1 boy in their class survived the war.
(source)
If history had a sound, sometimes it would be the hush just before a storm. A photograph exists—grainy, black and white—of a graduating class in Voronezh, USSR, spring of 1941. It’s just months before Operation Barbarossa, before the world changes for these young faces forever. The boys in the picture are still boys, but barely: their hair combed, jackets pressed, faces arranged somewhere between bravado and hope, standing at the threshold of adulthood. They’re dreaming about the future, and why shouldn’t they? Summer is coming. The world, in their eyes, is still open, unexplored.
There’s a cruelty in looking at this picture with the knowledge we have now. That within weeks, the Nazi invasion would thunder across the border. That Voronezh—an ancient city on the Don River—would find itself on the front lines of the bloodiest war in human history. And that out of all the boys in this class, only one would live to see peace.
The rest—what happened to them? Did they die in the forests outside Moscow, in the burning rubble of Stalingrad, in the endless mud of the steppe? Were they tank crews, infantry, partisans? Did they vanish in a single moment, or did their lives unravel over months of hunger, fear, and exhaustion? The numbers become almost impossible to process. The Soviet Union lost over 20 million people in World War II—most of them young, most of them with families, stories, dreams of their own. This single class in Voronezh is a microcosm of that annihilation, a wound that never fully healed.
Imagine being that one survivor. The guilt, the weight, the loneliness. Every year, as spring returns, as the city greens and new students celebrate their own graduations, you carry the memory of classmates who never got the chance. Maybe you remember their laughter echoing in the hallway, their plans for university, their whispered hopes for love and adventure. Maybe you wonder, again and again, why you survived and they didn’t.
But let’s not forget what came before the loss. These were ordinary kids, in an ordinary city, in an extraordinary time. The girls in the photograph wore ribbons in their hair, smiled for the camera, maybe teasing the boys about their awkward ties. They signed each other’s yearbooks, wrote little jokes, shared secrets about teachers and crushes. Their parents, if they were lucky, might have been proud—and terrified—watching their children step into a world teetering on the edge of war.
The war didn’t just take lives. It erased futures. It hollowed out cities and families and left scars so deep they run through generations. When the survivor from this class grew old—if he was allowed to—did he tell the stories? Did anyone listen? Was he haunted by the faces in the photograph, forever young while he grew older, stranger, more alone?
It’s easy, in history books, to talk about numbers, fronts, battles. But these abstractions dissolve when you look at a class photo and realize almost every boy in it was gone before he could truly live. The true cost of war isn’t just territory lost or won; it’s the empty seats at kitchen tables, the silences in schoolyards, the anniversaries marked not with celebration, but with mourning.
Voronezh survived. The Soviet Union survived. But these kids—these boys—paid the price. And the photograph survives too, a stubborn witness to everything that was lost. Maybe it reminds us, as only history can, that every number in a statistic is a life, a story, a family shattered by fate and by forces far beyond their control.
A Sudeten German woman crying tears of joy, as another salutes, during celebration parades on the German annexation of the Sudetenland, October 1938
It’s an image that’s almost too dense to unpack in a single sitting: a Sudeten German woman, overcome, her face streaked with tears of joy, as beside her another gives the crisp, unmistakable salute of the era. The crowd swells around them. The banners unfurl. The swastikas, the eagles, the sense of arrival. It’s October 1938, and the Sudetenland—the mountainous, industrial rim of Czechoslovakia—is being swallowed whole by the German Reich.
But let’s pause the tape here, just for a moment. Because what’s easy to miss—if you’re skimming the surface, if you’re seduced by the clarity of hindsight—is how complicated that joy really was. We like to imagine that history is composed of clean lines and sharp edges. Good guys and bad guys. Oppressed and oppressors. But when you stare at that woman’s face, you’re staring into a human soul that’s lived with decades of uncertainty, humiliation, and hope.
The Sudeten Germans, for generations, had existed in a sort of limbo. When the Austro-Hungarian Empire collapsed after World War I, new lines were drawn on the map by victors an ocean away. Suddenly, three million ethnic Germans found themselves minorities in the new state of Czechoslovakia—a nation built to serve the interests of Czechs and Slovaks, with the Germans tolerated, at best, and, at worst, viewed as fifth columnists. Their language, their customs, their sense of place—none of it felt secure anymore. Economic depressions battered the border regions. Nationalist rhetoric seeped in. Resentments festered.
So when the German troops rolled into the Sudetenland in 1938, they were greeted, in many places, as liberators. That’s not to exonerate the Nazi regime, nor to excuse the horrors that would follow, but it’s a reminder: for those Sudeten Germans, for that woman in the crowd, this wasn’t just the arrival of Hitler’s armies. It was the culmination of longing—sometimes for respect, sometimes for security, sometimes for simple belonging. The flags, the music, the uniforms, the choreography—these were all potent symbols that, for a moment, seemed to make the world make sense again.
It’s tempting, from our safe vantage point, to judge the tears and the salutes as naive, or sinister, or both. But people living in the moment don’t have the benefit of historical hindsight. They don’t know that, within a year, Czechoslovakia will be wiped off the map. That, within a year, Kristallnacht will tear through Jewish communities. That war—true, total, mechanized, world-destroying war—is coming.
But on this day in October 1938, the emotions are real. The sense of relief, of vindication, of coming home—palpable, even overwhelming. There’s something tragic about it, in retrospect. These people were celebrating what they believed was a homecoming, not realizing that it was, in fact, a funeral procession for the world they thought they were reclaiming. The banners would fade. The uniforms would be exchanged for other, more utilitarian ones—those of refugees, of prisoners, of survivors.
Vladimir Putin at the Age of 5 with Maria Ivanova. Soviet Union, 1958
Photographs have a way of bending time. Sometimes, if you stare at a picture long enough, it starts to feel like a portal—an invitation to imagine not just what was, but what could be. Picture this: it’s 1958 in the Soviet Union, in the city of Leningrad, still scarred by war and yet stubbornly alive. There’s a small boy, five years old, hair carefully combed, face round with the softness of childhood. Next to him stands Maria Ivanova, an ordinary woman by the standards of the day—maybe a teacher, a neighbor, or a family friend. It’s a simple moment, captured forever in grainy monochrome.
The boy is Vladimir Putin.
It’s almost impossible to look at this image now and not see the future swirling invisibly around it. We bring all of our knowledge—decades of headlines, war, intrigue, and iron-fisted rule—and layer it over the innocent face in the photograph. But in 1958, nobody knew what would come. Not Maria, not his parents, not even the child himself. It’s just another day in a country where history has always moved like an avalanche: sudden, violent, and largely indifferent to the hopes of the people living beneath it.
If you could step inside the frame, you’d smell cabbage soup drifting from open windows, hear the distant rumble of trams, see the stern, proud architecture battered by winter after winter. The city is rebuilding itself, trying to stitch together the psychic wounds of the Siege, the losses of war. In these neighborhoods, survival has always been a kind of victory.
Children play in the courtyards, inventing games out of nothing. Parents keep one eye on their kids and another on the ever-watchful state, wary of saying too much, remembering stories whispered behind closed doors. Maria Ivanova, like so many Soviet women, likely knows the feeling of loss—family gone to war, neighbors vanished in the night, fortunes turned upside down by the spinning wheel of ideology. But here, with little Volodya, there is only the present: a gentle hand on his shoulder, maybe a word of encouragement, maybe just a smile for the camera.
Putin himself was not born into privilege or power. His family scraped by, products of a country obsessed with order and discipline, haunted by insecurity. There is, perhaps, nothing extraordinary about the boy at this moment. He is as vulnerable to the whims of history as any other child in the Soviet Union. Yet, as fate would have it, this boy would one day become one of the most consequential leaders of the postwar world.
That’s the haunting paradox of this image. It’s so ordinary, so forgettable, and yet—because we know what’s coming—it throbs with historical weight. Would anyone have guessed that this little boy, lost in the crowd of postwar children, would one day redraw borders, stand toe-to-toe with American presidents, turn his nation’s fate with the stroke of a pen? Probably not. History hides its cards until the very last moment.
We are left to wonder: what was in his mind? Was he shy, ambitious, restless? Did Maria Ivanova see something different in his eyes, something that set him apart? Or did she just see another Soviet child, one of millions, hoping for a future that was a little safer, a little kinder?
The photograph reminds us that every leader was once a child, that every chapter of history begins with an ordinary moment. It asks us to imagine how the tides of politics, geography, and fate can lift up even the most anonymous among us. And it humbles us, too, because it’s a warning: we never know who will carry the torch next, or how their childhoods, their teachers, their hardships, will shape the world we all inherit.
East Berlin in the late 1980s
Try to imagine standing at the heart of a divided city—a city that has come to symbolize the fracture lines of an entire era. East Berlin, late 1980s. The Wall is still up. The Cold War hasn’t ended, but it’s beginning to unravel in ways that no one quite recognizes yet, not even the people living at the epicenter.
Walk down Karl-Marx-Allee, past the hulking Stalinist apartment blocks and the parade grounds built for mass demonstrations. The architecture is severe, monumental, and a little bit intimidating—designed to impress, to instruct, and, let’s be honest, to suppress. It’s a city built for a stage-managed society. Propaganda banners ripple in the wind, bearing slogans that praise the “scientific socialism” of the German Democratic Republic. Statues of Marx and Engels brood over broad boulevards, reminders that ideology here is not background noise—it’s the script of daily life.
But look closer. Behind the slogans and the grey facades is a population that has learned to adapt, to make do, to live double lives. Publicly, people go through the motions: working in the state-run factories, saluting the party, standing in line for bananas when a shipment comes through. Privately, there’s a subtle, simmering undercurrent of resignation, quiet rebellion, even black humor. In smoky apartments, families tune their radios to Western stations, picking up forbidden broadcasts from the other side—pop music, news, static-laced echoes of a different world just a few subway stops away, across the most infamous border in modern history.
You can almost taste the tension in the air. The Stasi—the dreaded state security service—is everywhere and nowhere, a Kafkaesque presence. Maybe your neighbor is an informer. Maybe your colleague is, too. You choose your words carefully. Trust is precious, and often dangerous. Children are taught to revere the state at school, but they’re just as likely to roll their eyes at home. The graffiti on the wall, visible from certain vantage points, sometimes hints at cynicism that’s hard to stamp out, even in a police state.
Yet, for all the repression, life in East Berlin is not simply a story of despair. There’s art here, sometimes brilliant, sometimes subversive, sometimes both. There’s theater, jazz, underground rock clubs—the “Ostrock” scene is bubbling beneath the surface, a counterculture with its own energy, its own code. There’s community, too, and a shared resilience: people helping each other navigate shortages, pooling resources, smuggling Western magazines or blue jeans. There’s a kind of dignity in the way people endure, an unspoken agreement to survive and, sometimes, to quietly resist.
And then there’s the Wall itself. It dominates everything, a scar of concrete and barbed wire, watchtowers and no-man’s-land, the physical embodiment of the political, emotional, and psychic divide. For some, the Wall is just part of the landscape—they’ve never known anything else. For others, it’s an open wound, a daily reminder of families separated, of a city split by ideology and by history.
As the 1980s wind down, you can feel something shifting. Gorbachev is in Moscow, talking about “glasnost” and “perestroika,” loosening the screws of the Soviet system. Dissident voices are getting louder, churches and peace groups are quietly organizing. There are whispers of demonstrations in Leipzig and Dresden, of daring escapes and bold protests. The air crackles with the sense that something big is coming, even if nobody knows quite what it is.
You stand on the Alexanderplatz at dusk, neon flickering over the wide, empty spaces. The future is out there, waiting, just on the other side of history. And in East Berlin, in the late 1980s, you’re living in the shadow of the Wall, but you can feel the ground starting to shift beneath your feet. You can feel the end of an era approaching, quietly at first, then all at once. And if you listen closely, you might just hear the faintest sound of concrete beginning to crack.
1st Lt. Thomas Meehan of Easy Company, 2nd Battalion, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division on his wedding day in 1942. Meehan was KIA on D-Day, June 6, 1944
Let’s stop time for a moment, and focus the lens on a single, bittersweet slice of history: the wedding day of 1st Lt. Thomas Meehan, sometime in 1942. It’s the era of swing music and ration books, telegrams and blackouts. Young men in uniform are a common sight, their faces still boyish, their futures uncertain. But on this day, in some small American church or courthouse, Thomas Meehan is just a groom—nervous, grinning, maybe sweating under his dress blues, standing at the edge of an ordinary life he’ll never get to live.
The photos from these weddings always have a particular look: the bride in white, eyes shining with hope and worry; the groom, so impossibly young, standing tall for the camera but probably shaking inside. The air is thick with the energy of the unknown. Everyone knows the world is at war, but in this moment, the threat feels far away, as though love itself can keep the darkness at bay. Family and friends gather close, smiling for the pictures, trying not to think about where these young men will be sent, what they might have to do, or who might not come back.
Thomas Meehan would become a leader of Easy Company, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division—the “Band of Brothers.” If you’ve read the books or watched the series, you know these men, at least in legend: the paratroopers who dropped behind enemy lines on the night before D-Day, tasked with sowing chaos and holding ground. But on his wedding day, Meehan is not yet a legend. He’s a young man in love, maybe thinking about the future—kids, a home, a job in peacetime America—dreams balanced on a knife’s edge.
There’s a haunting power in looking back, knowing what the people in the photo don’t. That in less than two years, on June 6, 1944, the C-47 Dakota carrying Meehan and his headquarters section will be hit by German anti-aircraft fire and crash in the early darkness of D-Day. That he will never set foot on French soil. That his name will become a line in a history book, a face in a faded photo, a story told by survivors.
But let’s not let hindsight rob Meehan of his humanity, or turn his story into just another statistic of the war. Think about what must have gone through his mind on that wedding day—the strange, surreal sense of living on borrowed time. Did he feel invincible, as so many young men do? Did he bargain with fate, promising to make it home if he fought hard and did his duty? Did he believe, deep down, that love and luck would protect him?
His bride must have felt it, too—the dread mixed with pride, the knowledge that the world had become a lottery, and the numbers were being drawn by men with maps and strategies thousands of miles away. When she kissed him that day, did she know it might be goodbye? Or did she refuse to believe it, because sometimes hope is all you have?
There’s a kind of sacredness in these wartime wedding photos. They are records of lives interrupted, of stories that could have gone so many other ways. Meehan’s life was short, but it was not small. He led men, inspired loyalty, made an impression deep enough to be remembered decades later. His death on D-Day was not the end of his story; it was a single, devastating chapter in the larger epic of a generation.
Related Posts:
